Greenhouse Plant Production Journal
Quarterly

Greenhouse evaluation of tomato cultivars across ripening stages for selection of superior breeding genotypes

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Somayeh Sardouei-Nasab 1
Somayeh Aminizadeh 2
Najmeh Zeinali Pour 3

1 Research and Technology Institute of Plant Production, Afzalipour Research Institute, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

2 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.

3 Department of Horticultural Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.61882/gppj.2.3.40
Abstract
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is a globally important vegetable crop, making the development of high-yielding, high-quality, and market-oriented cultivars a key breeding goal. This research investigated fruit yield and quality in 25 commercial tomato cultivars during three fruit ripening stages (S1: green, beginning of ripening, and S3: fully ripened under greenhouse conditions at Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was used. Measured traits included total soluble solids (TSS), fruit firmness (FF), color indices (a*, b*, and L*), pH, fruit length (FL), fruit width (FW), fresh and dry fruit weights (FFW, DFW), internode length (IL), and total yield (YLD). Significant genetic variation was detected among cultivars for most traits, except pH, FW, and b* at S3, indicating high potential for selection. The results provided practical cultivar recommendations based on market demands. For the fresh market, ‘Sylviana’, ‘TM10857’, and ‘GS12’ were notable for their high TSS, appealing color, and moderate firmness, while ‘Goldy’ and ‘Aragon’ exhibited balanced traits. For processing, ‘Izmir’, ‘Sama’, and ‘Bernetta’ were preferred due to their deep red color and lower TSS, and ‘SV4129TH’ and ‘Bassimo’ offered a desirable balance of firmness and color. Dual-purpose cultivars like ‘SVH4040’, ‘SV3725’, and ‘RFT112’ demonstrated strong yield, firmness, and TSS performance, making them adaptable choices for fresh markets and processing industries. Overall, this study provides valuable insights for breeding and selection of tomato cultivars aligned with both consumer and industry needs.

Keywords

Color indices
Cultivar selection
Fruit firmness
Fruit quality
Tomato
Total soluble solids
  1. Abewoy, D. 2017. Review on genetics and breeding of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Advances in Crop Science and Technology 5(5): 306. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8863.1000306.
  2. Al-Dairi, M., Pathare, P. B., and Al-Yahyai, R. 2021. Effect of postharvest transport and storage on color and firmness quality of tomato. Horticulturae, 7(7):163. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070163.
  3. Avdikos, I. D., Tagiakas, R., Tsouvaltzis, P., Mylonas, I., Xynias, I. N., and Mavromatis, A. G. 2021. Comparative evaluation of tomato hybrids and inbred lines for fruit quality traits. Agronomy, 11(3): 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030609.
  4. Azeez, S. S., Hamad, R. S., Hamad, B. K., Shekha, M. S., and Bergsten, P. 2024. Advances in CRISPR-Cas technology and its applications: Revolutionising precision medicine. Frontiers in Genome Editing, 6:1509924. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2024.1509924.
  5. Causse, M., Friguet, C., Coiret, C., Lépicier, M., Navez, B., Lee, M., and Grandillo, S. 2010. Consumer preferences for fresh tomato at the European scale: a common segmentation on taste and firmness. Journal of food science, 75(9): S531-S541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01841.x.
  6. Cheng, M., Wang, H., Fan, J., and Wang, Y. 2021. A global meta-analysis of yield and water use efficiency of crops, vegetables, and fruits under full, deficit, and alternate partial root-zone irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 248(12): 106771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106771.
  7. Ciptaningtyas, D., Benyakart, N., Umehara, H., Johkan, M., Nakamura, N., Nagata, M., and Shiina, T. 2022. Modeling the metachronous ripening pattern of mature green tomato as affected by cultivar and storage temperature. Scientific Reports, 12(1): 8241. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12219-z.
  8. Fahmideh, L., Rajabi, A., Dehestani, A., and Khorasaninejad, S. 2024. Investigating the Genetic Diversity of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Genotypes based on Yield and Morpho-Physiological Traits. Journal of Crop Breeding, 16(1): 46-60. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.61186/jcb.16.49.46.
  9. FAO. (2024). Agricultural production statistics - FAO Knowledge Repository. Retrieved October 21, 2025, from https://www.openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/df90e6cf-4178-4361-97d4-5154a9213877/content.
  10. Felföldi, Z., Ranga, F., Roman, I. A., Sestras, A. F., Vodnar, D. C., Prohens, J., and Sestras, R. E. 2022. Analysis of physico-chemical and organoleptic fruit parameters relevant for tomato quality. Agronomy, 12(5): 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051232.
  11. Figàs, M. R., Prohens, J., Raigón, M. D., Fita, A., García-Martínez, M. D., Casanova, C., and Soler, S. 2015. Characterization of composition traits related to organoleptic and functional quality for the differentiation, selection and enhancement of local varieties of tomato from different cultivar groups. Food Chemistry, 187: 517-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.083.
  12. Helyes, L., Pék, Z. and Lugasi, A. 2006. Tomato fruit quality and content depend on stage of maturity. HortScience, 41(6):1400-1401.
  13. Henareh, M., and Pierasteh, E. 2012. Study of genetic diversity and grouping of top tomato genotypes of West Azerbaijan. Second National Conference on Biodiversity and Its Impact on Agriculture and Environment 8 pages. (in Persian)
  14. Henareh, M., Dursun, A., and Mandoulakani, B. A. 2015. Genetic diversity in tomato landraces collected from Turkey and Iran revealed by morphological characters. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 14(2): 87-96.
  15. Hu, J., Wang, J., Muhammad, T., Yang, T., Li, N., Yang, H., Yu, Q., and Wang, B. 2024. Integrative analysis of metabolome and transcriptome of carotenoid biosynthesis reveals the mechanism of fruit color change in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(12): 6493. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126493.
  16. Huang, Y., Lu, R., Hu, D., and Chen, K. 2018. Quality assessment of tomato fruit by optical absorption and scattering properties. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 143, 78-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.04.016.
  17. Jürkenbeck, K., Spiller, A., and Meyerding, S. G. 2020. Tomato attributes and consumer preferences–a consumer segmentation approach. British Food Journal, 122(1): 328-344. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2018-0628.
  18. Kasnazany, S. A. S., Barznjy, L. G. K., Fatih, A. A., Mirza, A. N., and Krbchna, S. J. J. 2021. Comparative study related to physico-chemical properties of four tomato cultivars grown in Kurdistan region, Iraq. Kufa Journal for Agricultural Sciences, 13(2): 41-52.https://doi.org/10.36077/kjas/2021/130205.
  19. Keabetswe, L., Shao, G. C., Cui, J., Lu, J., and Stimela, T. 2019. A combination of biochar and regulated deficit irrigation improves tomato fruit quality: A comprehensive quality analysis. Folia Horticulturae, 31(1): 181-193. https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2019-0013.
  20. Khan, T., Rashid, R., Shah, L., Afroza, B., Khan, S., Bhat, M. A., and Sun, H. J. 2024. Genetic and phenotypic diversity in Solanum lycopersicum genotypes: insights from morpho-molecular and biochemical analyses. Plant Biotechnology Reports, 18(2): 207-221.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-024-00894-5.
  21. Kumar, A., Kumar, V., Gull, A., and Nayik, G.A. 2020. ). Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicon). In: Nayik, G.A., Gull, A. (Eds.), Antioxidants in Vegetables and Nuts - Properties and Health Benefits. Springer., Singapore, PP. 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7470-2_10
  22. Kumar, R., Paul, V., Pandey, R., Sahoo, R. N., Gupta, V. K., Asrey, R., and Jha, S. K. 2022. Reflectance based non-destructive assessment of tomato fruit firmness. Plant Physiology Reports, 27(3): 374-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-022-00678-5.
  23. Lee, J., Nazki, H., Baek, J., Hong, Y., and Lee, M. 2020. Artificial intelligence approach for tomato detection and mass estimation in precision agriculture. Sustainability, 12(21): 9138. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219138.
  24. Li, X., Wang, Y., Chen, S., Tian, H., Fu, D., Zhu, B., and Zhu, H. 2018. Lycopene is enriched in tomato fruit by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing. Frontiers in plant science, 9, 559. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00559.
  25. Li, J., Liu, F., Wu, Y., Tang, Z., Zhang, D., Lyu, J., Khan, K.S., Xiao, X. and Yu, J. 2024. Evaluation of nutritional composition, biochemical, and quality attributes of different varieties of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 132: 106384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106384.
  26. López Camelo, A.F., and Gómez, P.A. 2004. Comparison of color indexes for tomato ripening. Horticultura Brasileira, 22: 534-537. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362004000300006.
  27. Pandurangaiah, S., Sadashiva, A. T., Shivashankar, K. S., SudhakarRao, D. V., and Ravishankar, K. V. 2020. Carotenoid content in cherry tomatoes correlated to the color space values l*, a*, b*: A non-destructive method of estimation. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 15(1): 27-34.
  28. Prakash, O., Choyal, P., Godara, A., and Choudhary, S. 2019. Mean performance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes for yield, yield parameters and quality traits. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 8: 763–765.
  29. Saidi, M. E. H. D. I., Warade, S. D., and Prabu, T. 2008. Combining ability estimates for yield and its contributing traits in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 10(2): 238-240.
  30. Swarup, S., Cargill, E.J., Crosby, K., Flagel, L., Kniskern, J. and Glenn, K.C. 2021. Genetic diversity is indispensable for plant breeding to improve crops. Crop Science, 61(2): 839-852. .https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20377
  31. Vardanian, I., Sargsyan, G., Martirosayn, G., Pahlevanyan, A., Tsereteli, I., Martorosyan, H., Khachatryan, L., Zurabyan, A., and Harutyunyan, Z. 2025. Lycopene in tomatoes: genetic regulation, agronomic practices, and environmental influence. Functional Food Science, 5(4): 127-145. https://doi.org/10.31989/ffs.v5i4.1617.
  32. Vela-Hinojosa, C., Escalona-Buendía, H. B., Mendoza-Espinoza, J. A., Villa-Hernández, J. M., Lobato-Ortíz, R., Rodríguez-Pérez, J. E., and Pérez-Flores, L. J. 2019. Antioxidant balance and regulation in tomato genotypes of different color. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 144(1): 45-54. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS04525-18.
  33. Waiba, K. M., Sharma, P., Kumar, K. I., and Chauhan, S. 2021. Studies of genetic variability of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) hybrids under protected environment. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management, 12(4): 264-270.https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2021.2211.
  34. Wei, T., Simko, V., Levy, M., Xie, Y., Jin, Y., and Zemla, J. 2017. Package ‘corrplot’. Statistician, 56(316): e24.
  35. Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  36. Wind, J. J, Smeekens, S., Hanson, J. 2010. Sucrose: Metabolite and signaling molecule. Phytochemistry, 71(14-15): 1610-1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.07.007.
  37. Zhang, J., Lyu, H., Chen, J., Cao, X., Du, R., Ma, L., and Huang, S. 2024. Releasing a sugar brake generates sweeter tomato without yield penalty. Nature, 635(8039): 647–656.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08186-2.
Greenhouse Plant Production Journal
Volume 2, Issue 3
Summer 2025
Pages 40-50

  • Receive Date 07 July 2025
  • Revise Date 25 August 2025
  • Accept Date 26 September 2025
  • First Publish Date 26 September 2025
  • Publish Date 01 September 2025

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us