Importance of rootstock and indole butyric acid in propagation of Chaenomeles japonica L. by stenting method under greenhouse condition

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment Science, Arak University, 38156-8-8349 Arak, Iran

Abstract
A challenge in cultivating Chaenomeles japonica L. is the occurrence of iron chlorosis. Employing rootstocks that are tolerant of calcareous soils represents the effective strategy for addressing the encounters posed by alkaline soils. This study examines the compatibility of Chaenomeles japonica L. grafting with rootstocks and evaluates the influence of IBA on the grafting process using the stenting method. The investigation focused on the influence of IBA (0, 1000, and 2000 mg l-1) and rootstocks (Rosa alba, Pyracantha coccinea, Malus domestica cv. Gami Almasi, Pyracantha coccinea, Cydonia oblonga, and the Malling M9) utilizing the budding grafting and splice grafting technique. The evaluation of traits, success of the grafting, rooting percentage, root volume, the number of activated scions, the callus formation, the length of shoot, the inter-node distance, and the leaves number, was conducted. The findings indicated that the application of IBA effectively promoted root development. The most significant root development was observed in Chaenomeles japonica L. when grafted onto Rosa alba rootstock and subjected to at 2000 mg of IBA. The Pyracantha coccinea exhibited the lowest number of activated grafts; however, it demonstrated the highest callus formation at the grafting site among the rootstocks, suggesting a superior grafting potential. It is considered a suitable candidate for the propagation of Chaenomeles japonica L. grafts through the cutting-grafting technique. Grafting Chaenomeles japonica L. on Pyracantha coccinea demonstrates superior compatibility and enhanced growth vigor. It is expected that this rootstock will exhibit improved tolerance to alkaline soil, potentially eliminating the leaf early chlorosis.

Keywords


  1. Alizadeh, M., Yadegari, M., Davarynejad, G., and Nemati, S.H. 2022. The Rootstock and Scion Interaction Effects on Growth and Bearing Characteristics of Young Pear Trees. Journal of Horticultural Science, 36(2): 519-531. https://doi.org/10.22067/jhs.2022.73938.1112
  2. Atkinson, C.J., and Else, M.A. 2003. Enhancing harvest index in temperate fruit tree crops through the use of dwarfing rootstocks. In: International Workshop on Cocoa Breeding for Improved Production Systems. Accra, Ghana. 118-131. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erg132
  3. Babaei, H., Zarei, H., Hemmati, K. 2015. The Effect of Different Concentrations of IBA, Type of Plant Rootstock and Timeing of Cuttings on Propagation of Ficus benjamina CV. Variegata by Cutting - Graft. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 5(17): 253-261. http://jcpp.iut.ac.ir/article-1-2424-fa.html
  4. Buck, G.J. 1978. Rose rootstocks. Hortscience. 13: 601- 602.
  5. Campbell, J. 2003. Pear rootstocks. NSW. Ext. Pub. Agfact. New South Wales Agriculture, Australia.
  6. Davarynejad, G., Shokouhian, A. A., and Tehranifar, A. 2015. 'Effect of IBA and Medium on Rooting of Two New Selected Peach × Almond Hybrids Cuttings'. Journal of Horticultural Science, 29(2): 176-184. doi: 10.22067/jhorts4.v0i0.27561
  7. Esmaili, A., Abdollahi, H., Bazgir, M., and Abdossi, V. 2020. Growth and nutrients uptake in commercial pear cultivars on seedling, Pyrodwarf and OH × F69 rootstocks. Seed and Plant Journal, 036(4): 403-420. 10.22092/SPPI.2021.123892
  8. Hartman, H.T., Kester, D.E., Davies, F.T, and Geneve R.L. 2002. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practice. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 880.
  9. Hazar, D., and Ibrahim, B. 2005. Graft compatibility between two cut rose cultivers and a dog rose rootstock. Acta Horticulturae 690: 143-148. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.690.21
  10.  Ikinci, A., Bolat, I., Ercisli, I., and Kodad, O. 2014. Influence of rootstocks on growth, yield, and fruit quality and leaf mineral element contents of pear cv. Santa Maria in semi-arid conditions. Biology Research, 47: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/0717-6287-47-71
  11. Ingle, M.R., and Venugopal, C.K. 2009. Effect of Different Growth Regulators on Rooting of Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) Cuttings. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 22,455-456.
  12. Izadi, Z., Zarei, H., and Alizadeh, M. 2013. Role of grafting technique on the success of stenting propagation of two rose (Rosa sp.) varieties. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 4.5A: 41-44. DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2013.45A006
  13. Jiang, S., Ou, Q., Wang, F., Zhang, Y., Ma, L., and Zhao, Y. 2018. Development and application of pear dwarf stock in China. North Fruits, 2: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.16376/j.cnki.bfgs.2018.02.001
  14. Karbasi, M., and Arzani, K. 2018. Scion/rootstock interaction in some European (Pyrus communis L.) and Asian (Pyrus serotina Rehd.) pear cultivars on vegetatively propagated Pyrodwarf rootstock. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 34(2): 191-205. 10.22092/SPPJ.2018.118944
  15. Khalighi, A. 1991. Floriculture and Ornamental Plants of Iran. Rozbahan Press, Tehran, 392 p.
  16. Khalili, R., Nekonam, F., Khsosi, M., Naderi, R., and Jabarzadeh, J. 2011. The Effect of indole butyric acid hormone concentration and rootstock on propagation of rose Cv. "Olivia" through stenting technique Agroecology Journal, 6(4): 15
  17. Khosh-Khui, M., and M. Zargarian. 2009. Effects of four rootstocks on growth and development of three rose scion cultivars. In V International Symposium on Rose Research and Cultivation 870: 207-212. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.870.27
  18. Prado, R.M., and Alcántara-Vara, E. 2011. Tolerance to iron chlorosis in non-grafted quince seedlings and in pear grafted onto quince plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 11: 119–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162011000400009
  19. Rahmati, M., Arzani, K., Yadollahi, A., and Abdollahi, H. 2015. Influence of rootstock on vegetative growth and graft incompatibility in some pear (Pyrus spp.) cultivars. Indo-American Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, 3: 225-232. doi: 10.1186/0717-6287-47-71
  20. Reezi, S., Naderi, R., Khalighi, A., Zamani, Z., and Etemad, V. 2006. Asexual propagation of (Picea pungens Koster) through cuttings and grafting under various hormonal treatments. Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, 59(3): 589-601.
  21. Rufato, L., Machado, B.D., Kretzschmar, A.A., Bogo, A., Luz, A.R. and Marcon Filho, J.L. 2014. Effect of high plant density on growth and production variables of European pear cultivars and quince rootstock combinations in southern Brazil. Acta Horticulture, 1058: 71-76. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1058.6
  22. Rumpunen, K. 2002. Chaenomeles: potential new fruit crop for northern Europe. Trends in new crops and new uses. Asha press, alexandria, va. 385–392.
  23. Singh, A.K., Singh, R., Mittal, A.K., Singh, Y. P. and Jauhari, S. 2003. Effect of plant growth regulators on survival rooting and growth characters in long pepper (Piper longum L.). Progressive Horticulture. 35: 208-211.
  24. Soleymani, A., Rabiei, V., Hasani, D., and Amiri, M. 2009. Effects of rootstock and cultivar on propagation of rabido Walnut (Juglans regia L.) using hypocotyle grafting. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 25(1): 93-101. doi: 10.22092/sppj.2017.110366
  25. Solgi, M., Shahrjerdi, I., and Ebadi, A. 2012. Effects of scion genotype, rootstock age and time of grafting on success of soft grafting method in walnut. Acta Horticulturae. 940:119-123. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.940.14
  26. Solgi, M., Taghizadeh, M., and Bagheri, H. 2022. Response of black mulberry onto white mulberry rootstock to stenting (cutting-grafting) techniques and IBA concentrations. Ornamental Horticulturae. 28.1:78–84. https://doi.org/10.1590/2447-536X.v28i1.2413
  27. Teale, W.D., Paponov, I.A., Ditengou, F. and Palme, K. 2005. Auxin and the developing root of Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Plant Physiology. 123:130-138.
  28. Zamorskyi, V. 2011. Features of anatomic structure of the grafted young apple trees as the factor which forms potential efficiency. Acta Horticulturae. 903: 897-902. DOI:10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.903.125
Volume 1, Issue 4
Autumn 2024
Pages 1-10

  • Receive Date 29 November 2024
  • Revise Date 23 December 2024
  • Accept Date 28 December 2024
  • First Publish Date 28 December 2024
  • Publish Date 01 December 2024